Why Your Centrelink Relationship Status May Not Match Your Family Law Status

This is educational content.

This article provides general information only. It is not legal advice. Family law outcomes depend on your circumstances. You should speak with a family lawyer before making decisions about your matter.

c6b7d7c2 328d 4d79 a095 9f85d22b8b62

Family law matters can be slightly more complicated for de facto partners than spouses. While a married couple has a marriage certificate, de facto couples often have to prove their relationship status to Centrelink. Many clients assume that Centrelink uses the same test as the Family Law Act to determine if a de facto relationship existed. However, there are differences which can catch some people out. This difference can impact certain issues post-separation.

d6878f51 ec0d 4bf3 ac72 bfa9e7c0cded

How Centrelink assesses a de facto relationship

Centrelink has an interest in defining the nature of your relationship. Your status can affect the government payments you may be entitled to, as your partner’s income and assets may be relevant to your eligibility. Financial support available from Centrelink includes:

A de facto relationship has to meet all of the following criteria:

  • The relationship is marriage-like.

  • You’re not legally married or in a registered relationship.

  • You’re above the age of consent in the Australian state or territory.

  • You’re not in a prohibited relationship.

Centrelink uses a ‘member of a couple’ model set down in Section 4 of the Social Security Act 1991. This model contains five factors determine whether you and your de facto partner are living on a genuine domestic basis, rather than relying on one factor alone. This includes:

  • Whether there’s a sexual relationship.

  • How much of a mutual commitment there is to a shared life.

  • The financial and social aspects of the relationship, such as joint bank accounts, joint assets, living arrangements, joint decisions, and how you present the relationship publicly.

  • The nature of the household.

The existence of a sexual relationship is relevant but not decisive, and public recognition can also help confirm the relationship.

Crucially, Centrelink’s approach isn’t generally concerned with how long the relationship has existed. Even if you’ve only been together for a matter of weeks, your relationship may still be considered de facto. Any change in your relationship status should be reported to Centrelink within 14 days.

Not all states allow registration, but you can register a de facto relationship in five states. Registration is not available in the Northern Territory or Western Australia.

Both partners must be at least 18 to register, and the application usually requires a statutory declaration and a fee you pay in the relevant state.

How this differs from family law

Family law determines de facto relationships with the legal criteria in Section 4AA of the Family Law Act, rather than Section 4 of the Social Security Act. However, the two sections contain similar factors, and family law also asks whether a relationship was marriage-like rather than requiring marriages.

The main difference between Centrelink and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia’s (FCFCOA) approach is the importance of relationship length. Under Section 90SB, the FCFCOA only has the jurisdiction to make a property or maintenance order for a de facto couple if the parties have been together for at least two years. A de facto partner can seek similar property rights to a married couple and, where children are involved, similar parental rights. If separation involves children, the court may also need to consider parenting arrangements. Exceptions to this requirement are the following:

  • There are children of the relationship.

  • The applicant made substantial contributions under Section 90SM.

  • Not making an order would be a serious injustice to the applicant.

  • You have a registered domestic relationship under the prescribed law of a state or territory, as a prescribed kind of relationship under that law in the relevant state or territory, and registration does not always require living under the same roof.

6ed27772 ec53 406f 9845 5485f4423787

Why the two can give different answers

You may find yourself in a position where Centrelink has assessed you as part of a de facto relationship, while the FCFCOA hasn’t. The reason the difference exists is that Centrelink and the FCFCOA have different aims and are governed by separate legislation, and Centrelink may also confirm a de facto relationship for social security purposes even where the family law threshold for court action is not met.

  • Centrelink is concerned with a party’s current financial circumstances and how they affect your access to government benefits. This affects what you may be paid because Centrelink looks at the other partner’s income and assets as well. Your partner’s finances may affect you from the very beginning of the relationship. To account for this, Centrelink factors in your relationship as soon as it meets the relevant criteria.

  • The FCFCOA manages your legal rights during a property proceeding. Importantly, the 2-year requirement doesn’t determine if the relationship is valid. It determines whether the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has the authority to make property or maintenance orders after the relationship breakdown. After separation, you may need to make a claim for property settlement or financial support, and a time limit will usually apply. If domestic violence is involved, or there are urgent issues with an ex partner and children, legal advice should be sought quickly.

65fb22c1 1090 4351 93c4 a6a2d0eb9679

Understanding how your relationship status may be assessed under Australian law is important to protect your rights. If you’re seeking a property settlement but are unsure about your entitlements, contact a family lawyer.

Andrews Family Lawyers has over a decade of experience supporting clients with their property matters. Contact us for a free consultation.

Disclaimer: The content on this blog is intended to provide general information only and does not constitute legal advice. It hasn’t been prepared with your individual circumstances in mind and should not be used as a substitute for personalised legal advice. Andrews Family Lawyers accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on this information. We recommend you seek advice from a qualified legal professional before making legal or financial decisions.

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Peter Andrews - Andrews Family Lawyers 4
Principal Solicitor

Peter Andrews

Peter is a qualified legal practitioner with more than twenty years experience, predominantly in family law. Peter began his career with Clayton Utz, before moving into suburban practice in 2007 with a focus on family law settlements.

Peter began his own practice, Peter Andrews Lawyer Pty Ltd, in 2013. After many years in practice, the business was rebranded Andrews Family Lawyers in 2022.

Are you looking for family lawyers?

Andrews Family Lawyers is led by Peter Andrews, who has practised law since 2013, with a focus on family law, we dedicate ourselves to advocating for your rights and navigating you through legal complexities. Allow us to manage it on your behalf.

Search Blogs

Follow us on